Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online:439
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 227-230

Frequency of irregular red cell antibodies in blood donor population


Department of Transfusion Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Date of Submission06-Apr-2019
Date of Acceptance06-Aug-2019
Date of Web Publication17-Oct-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Ashish Jain
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/GJTM.GJTM_28_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Introduction: Irregular red blood cell (RBC) antibodies may occur in blood donors and potentially can lead to transfusion reactions or decreased survival of transfused RBCs. Therefore, it is necessary to know the prevalence of alloantibodies in donors and their clinical significance. Aims and Objectives: The study was aimed to determine the prevalence of RBC alloantibodies in blood donors. Materials and Methods: ABO typing and RhD typing were performed using the fully automated immunohematology analyzer (Qwalys 3, Diagast, France). For RhD-negative samples, a “weak D” testing was also performed by tube technique using a blend (immunoglobulin M [IgM] + IgG) of anti-D antisera (Tulip Diagnostics, Goa, India). Antibody screening (3-cell panel) and identification (11-cell panel) were done by gel technique (LISS-Coombs AHG Card, Bio-Rad, Switzerland). The antibody titer was done using the tube technique. Results: During the study period, a total of 2310 donor samples were tested. Out of these, 2299 (99.56%) were male and 11 (0.44%) were female. ABO distribution was found to be maximum for blood group B (34.5%), followed by O (33.3%), A (22%), and AB (10.3%). Among the total donors, 2085 (90.3%) were RhD positive. All the RhD-negative samples were negative on “weak D” testing. Antibody screen was positive for only one sample (0.043%); the alloantibody identified was anti-M, which was reactive in anti-human globulin phase as well, and the titer was 1. It was from a male donor who had no history of transfusion. One sample (0.04%) showed autoantibody weak positive (wk+), and there was one ABO discrepancy (0.04%), which was due to weak subgroup of A. Conclusion: The prevalence of RBC alloantibodies is 0.043% (1/2310) in our donor population. As the sample size was small, larger studies are needed to determine the actual prevalence of alloantibodies in donors.

Keywords: Alloantibody, blood grouping, irregular red cell antibody


How to cite this article:
Bharathan P, Jain A, Marwaha N. Frequency of irregular red cell antibodies in blood donor population. Glob J Transfus Med 2019;4:227-30

How to cite this URL:
Bharathan P, Jain A, Marwaha N. Frequency of irregular red cell antibodies in blood donor population. Glob J Transfus Med [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 20];4:227-30. Available from: http://www.gjtmonline.com/text.asp?2019/4/2/227/269382




  Introduction Top


All red cell (RBC) antibodies other than naturally occurring anti-A and anti-B are called unexpected or irregular antibodies. They may be present in the form of alloantibodies or autoantibodies. The main stimuli for development of irregular RBC antibodies in healthy donors are previous transfusion and/or pregnancies.[1] A clinically significant red cell antibody is defined as an antibody that is frequently associated with hemolytic disease of the fetus and the newborn (HDFN), with hemolytic transfusion reaction (HTR) or with a notable decrease in the survival of red cells.[2] HTRs due to RBC alloantibodies in donor blood occur rarely. However, when the transfusion recipients are pediatric patients, especially infants, or when given in the setting of massive transfusion, these alloantibodies can cause immune hemolysis and severe transfusion reaction.[1] Therefore, it is necessary to know the prevalence of alloantibodies and their clinical significance.

Alloantibodies also have the potential to cause HTRs in patients who require multiple transfusions, as in those with hematological malignancies, congenital or acquired hemolytic anemia, or blood dyscrasias. Hence, compatibility of the recipients with donor blood with respect to minor group antibodies is important in preventing this.[3],[4],[5] Warm-reactive antibodies are usually predominantly immunoglobulin G (IgG) and react between 30°C and 37°C. IgG antibodies are important in mature humoral immune effector function and are divided into four subclasses – IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4. The seroprevalence of alloantibodies in blood donors around the world has been estimated as being 0.3% (0.2%–0.8%).[1]

In India, as per the DGHS Technical Manual guidelines under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, donor blood should be tested for unexpected antibodies by saline albumin/enzyme and anti-human globulin (AHG) tests with screening panel or with pooled fresh O group red cells.[6] However, in most blood banks across the country, the practice varies. In some studies from India, the reported prevalence of alloantibodies was 0.04%–0.09% in donors.[7],[8],[9]

Aims and objectives

This prospective study aimed to determine the prevalence of RBC alloantibodies in blood donors and find their specificity and titer.


  Materials and Methods Top


This was a prospective prevalence study on donor samples collected from whole blood donations done at the blood donation center of our institute over a period of 4 months (February to May 2015). Ethics: The study was approved by the Institute Ethics Committee (Letter No. Histo/15/IMEC/42 dated January 12, 2015). As it was a nonfunded study, the target samples size was kept at around 4%–5% of our annual collection (50,000 units approximately). ABO typing and RhD typing were performed using the fully automated immunohematology analyzer (Qwalys 3, Diagast, France). The equipment is based on “erythrocyte-magnetized” technology, and the configuration included typing with anti-A, anti-B, and anti-D in forward grouping and A1 and B cells in reverse grouping (Hemalys, A1, B cells, Diagast, France). For RhD-negative samples, a “weak D” testing was also performed by tube technique using a blend (IgM + IgG) of anti-D antisera (Tulip Diagnostics, Goa, India). The testing was done till the AHG phase, and the sample was considered as RhD negative only after the “weak D” testing was negative. Antibody screening and identification were done using 0.8% (± 0.1%) commercial preparation of O group red cells, a 3-cell panel (ID-DiaCell I-II-III, Bio-Rad, Switzerland) and an 11-cell panel (ID-DiaPanel, Bio-Rad, Switzerland), respectively. The testing was done by column agglutination (gel) technique (LISS-Coombs ID-Card, Bio-Rad, Switzerland) where each microtube contained polyspecific AHG (rabbit anti-IgG and monoclonal anti-C3d, cell line C139-9) within the gel matrix. After adding 50 μL of the red cell suspension of the antibody screening/identification cells to each microtube, 25 μL of donor's plasma was added. It was then incubated at 37°C for 15 min in a dedicated incubator (ID-Incubator 37 S I, Bio-Rad, Switzerland), followed by centrifugation at 1030 rpm (85 g) for 10 min (ID-Centrifuge 12 S II, Bio-Rad, Switzerland).[10] Subsequently, the results were graded from 0 (negative) to 4+, and interpretation regarding the possible alloantibody was done using the respective antigen tables provided with the antibody screening and identification cell panels. An autologous control was also run with each antibody screen using the RBC and plasma from the same donor. Antibody titer was done using the tube technique with endpoint titer as the reciprocal of the highest dilution at which 1+ agglutination was observed.[10] Any sample found to be reactive or positive on transfusion-transmissible infection screening was excluded from the study. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 15.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data are presented as mean, median, and percentage.


  Results Top


During the study period, a total of 2310 donor samples were tested. Out of these, 2299 (99.5%) were males and 11 (0.48%) were females. The maximum number of donors was of the age group of 18–29 years (n = 1233, 53.4%), while there were only eight donors in the age group of 60–65 years (0.3%) [Figure 1]. There were 753 (32.6%) donors in the age group of 30–39 years, 260 (11.3%) in the age group of 40–49 years, and 56 (2.4%) in the age group of 50–59 years. The mean age of the donors was 30.3 years, and the median age was 30 years. The state-wise distribution of donors according to their place of residence is given in [Table 1]. ABO distribution was found to be maximum for blood group B (796; 34.5%), followed by O (769; 33.3%), A (508; 22%), and AB (237; 10.3%). RhD testing showed that 2085 (90.3%) donors were RhD positive and 225 (9.7%) were RhD negative. All the RhD-negative samples were negative on “weak D” testing. Only 1 out of 2310 donor samples (0.043%) was found to be positive for antibody screening; the alloantibody specificity was found to be anti-M antibody, which was reactive in AHG phase, and the titer was 1 in AHG phase, negative on immediate spin. One donor sample (0.04%) was weak positive (wk+) on autocontrol. There was one ABO discrepancy (0.04%), which turned out to be weak subgroup of A, as resolved by the adsorption-elution technique.
Figure 1: Number of donors in different age groups (n = 2310)

Click here to view
Table 1: State-wise origin of blood donors (n=2310)

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


RBC alloantibodies are known to occur in general population. Those of clinical significance may result in HTR, HDFN and/or decreased survival of the transfused RBCs in the recipients. The prevalence of alloantibodies was found to be 0.043% (1/2310) in our donor population. The only screen-positive sample belonged to a 21-year old male replacement donor from Uttar Pradesh. From the details given in the donor registration form, it was found that he had no history of transfusion in the past. The alloantibody was identified to be anti-M which was reactive only in the AHG phase and not in the immediate spin saline phase and thus was probably an IgG type of alloantibody with a low titer (1). Anti-M is a relatively common naturally occurring antibody in adults, which reacts optimally at 4°C and weakly or not at all at 37°C and thus may not be clinically significant. At times, the naturally occurring anti-M may exist as IgG type only.[1] When anti-M is encountered to be active at 37°C, it may cause acute or delayed HTRs and rarely HDFN.[10] [Table 2] enlists various studies on frequency of RBC alloantibodies in donor population.
Table 2: Studies on frequency of alloantibodies in blood donors

Click here to view


Tormey et al.[13] observed a prevalence of RBC alloantibodies as 2.4% in a population of male military veterans. It was a relatively higher prevalence despite the fact that, in their study population, there was a male predominance and a lack of pregnancy-related alloimmunization. They hypothesized that the stimulus for alloimmunization in this population could be the combat-related transfusion. Ameen et al.[16] also found that the prevalence of RBC alloantibodies was quite high in their blood donors (2.3%), whereas it was 0.49% in Kuwaiti general population with frequency of alloantibodies being three times higher in females as compared to males. Zhu et al.[15] too found a higher frequency of alloantibodies in female donors with overall prevalence of 0.279% in donors of the Shaoguan area. The authors recommended that antibody screening must be performed for all female donors to ensure the safety of the corresponding plasma recipients like in case of massive transfusion and infants.

Among the studies done on blood donors in India, Pahuja et al.[7] (Delhi, 2012) reported a prevalence of 0.05% (4/7756). The alloantibody specificities in these 4 donors were anti-C (in 2) and anti-Lea (in 1), while the fourth donor had an autoantibody. All of them were male donors. One of the donors with anti-C (titer: 4) had a history of transfusion 4 years back, and the alloantibody was reactive at 37°C in AHG phase, while the anti-Lea was IgM type (titer: 1) with lack of reactivity at 37°C, thus clinically not significant. Garg et al.[8] (Delhi, 2014) screened 47450 donors and found a prevalence of 0.09% (46 donors). The frequency of alloantibodies was higher in females (male-to-female ratio of 8.25:1) and was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Amongst the five alloimmunized females, three had a history of single uncomplicated pregnancy. They found that the alloantibodies to MNS blood group system (47.8%; 22/46) was the most common followed by those of Rh blood group system (39.1%; 18/46). In an another study by Tiwari et al.[9] (2012), the cumulative incidence of RBC alloantibodies was 0.12% and 0.009% among patients (n = 32,560) and donors (n = 31,367), respectively. In donors, anti-M was the most common (66.6%) alloantibody.

The frequency of alloantibodies in the present study is low as compared with studies done in the West but similar to those reported from the studies in North India. The reasons for this could be multifactorial. Most of the studies from India had a lower percentage of female donors, as was in our study as well (0.48% females), who are more likely to be alloimmunized, possibly due to previous pregnancy(ies). Female donors who qualify for donation and may have a history of pregnancy tend to have received transfusions, and the incidence of alloantibodies in them is higher.[4],[17] The present study also included a heterogeneous group, with donors being included from 12 states in North and North West India.

Strength and limitations of the study

Although the sample size was small, the majority (2125/2310; 92%) of the donors in this study were representative of the donor population of this region of North India. Nevertheless, the prevalence of irregular antibodies was similar to those reported in other studies from our country. However, the sample size in our study was not large enough to reflect the true prevalence of alloantibodies in blood donors of our country as more heterogeneous population across various regions needs to be included for determining the same.


  Conclusion Top


The prevalence of RBC alloantibodies was found to be 0.043% (1/2310) in our donor population. Thus, it appears that the overall prevalence of irregular antibodies in donors is quite low in our region of the country. However, further studies from different regions of the country are required for knowing the true prevalence, which would also help to derive policy to prioritize the available resources across blood centers in the country.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Klein HG, Anstee DJ, editors. Mollison's Blood Transfusion in Clinical Medicine. 12th ed. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; 2014.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Roback JD, Grossman BJ, Harris T, Hillyer CD, editors. Technical Manual. 17th ed. Maryland, United States: AABB Press; 2011.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Gibson BE, Todd A, Roberts I, Pamphilon D, Rodeck C, Bolton-Maggs P, et al. Transfusion guidelines for neonates and older children. Br J Haematol 2004;124:433-53.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Spielmann W, Seidl S. Prevalence of irregular red cell antibodies and their significance in blood transfusion and antenatal care. Vox Sang 1974;26:551-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Zettner A, Bove JR. Hemolytic transfusion reaction due to interdonor incompatibility. Transfusion 1963;3:48-51.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Saran RK. Transfusion Medicine Technical Manual. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2003.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Pahuja S, Kushwaha S, Sethi N, Pujani M, Jain M. Screening of blood donors for erythrocyte alloantibodies. Hematology 2012;17:302-5.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Garg N, Sharma T, Singh B. Prevalence of irregular red blood cell antibodies among healthy blood donors in Delhi population. Transfus Apher Sci 2014;50:415-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Tiwari AK, Pandey P, Sharma J, Shailja K, Dixit S, Raina V. Incidence of clinically significant antibodies in patients and healthy blood donors: A prospective cross-sectional study from a tertiary healthcare center in India. Transfus Apher Sci 2014;50:230-4.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Fung MK, Grossman BJ, Hillyer CD, Westhoff CM, editors. Technical Manual. 18th ed. Maryland, United States. AABB Press; 2014.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Keokhamphoui C, Urwijitaroon Y, Kongphaly D, Thammavong T. Red cell alloantibodies in Lao blood donors. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2014;45:194-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Promwong C, Siammai S, Hassarin S, Buakaew J, Yeela T, Soisangwan P, et al. Frequencies and specificities of red cell alloantibodies in the Southern Thai population. Asian J Transfus Sci 2013;7:16-20.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
13.
Tormey CA, Fisk J, Stack G. Red blood cell alloantibody frequency, specificity, and properties in a population of male military veterans. Transfusion 2008;48:2069-76.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
García MA, Bautista L, Palomino F. Should blood donors be routinely screened for irregular antibodies? Immunohematology 2012;28:60-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Zhu JY, Lan JC, Luo HQ. Screening analysis of irregular antibodies from random donor population in Shaoguan area. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 2007;15:630-1.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Ameen R, Al-Eyaadi O, Al-Shemmari S, Chowdhury R, Al-Bashir A. Frequency of red blood cell alloantibody in Kuwaiti population. Med Princ Pract 2005;14:230-4.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Giblett ER. Blood group alloantibodies: An assessment of some laboratory practices. Transfusion 1977;17:299-308.  Back to cited text no. 17
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed101    
    Printed5    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded13    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]